Alien Confidential Multimedia/Alien Confidential Multimedia (Disk 1 of 9).adf/MISC/096

Text File | 1995-04-23 | 6KB | 100 lines

Subject: Proof of Aliens
Date: 1 Jan 1995 21:00:06 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company  1-800-PRODIGY
Lines: 89
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3e754m$[e-mail]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: inugap4.news.prodigy.com
X-Newsreader: Version 1.2

To All:

I never saw a UFO but I was impressed by a TV broadcast. of Mexicoâs
edition of 60 Minutes and their coverage of the 1991 eclipse.  As a
result, I think alien Space Ships are in our atmosphere but world
governments are hushing it up.  Maybe our leaders already cut a deal with
them.  Maybe they donât want to upset us.  Maybe they want to study the
phenomena a while longer.  Unsolved Mysteries, in the Fall of 94, covered
a documentary done by the Mexican edition of 60 Minutes.  60 Minutes and
millions of Mexicans turned out to watch the eclipse.  Many had video
recorders.  When the Sun was blacked out, a UFO hovered where the Sun was.
  This was filmed by 60 minutes, observed by millions people and video
recorded by 15 others.  60 Minutes (in Mexico) did a show about the
incident.  40,000 calls came in to the TV station which overloaded and
shut down their phone system.  15 tapes were sent to the producer.  7 of
the tapes show what appears to be the same ship at the same time.  The
UFO was larger than a dot and it had a small shadow under it.  It moved
around very quickly when it was not standing still.  The broadcast showed
enlargements but not stills.  The enlarged full motion video filled a lot
of my TV screen.  It was large and showed some detail although it was
pretty blurry.  Several Mexican families video taped the event.  Some of
these families were 60 miles and 200 miles away from Mexico City but
their video recordings showed the same thing.  The video images were
shown side by side on a split screen and they really looked the same.  My
guess is that there were several ships around.  Otherwise one ship would
have been gigantic.  I recorded the TV show and played it back.  As I
watched, the image was blurry.  Then I did a freeze frame and a frame by
frame advance which was something the TV show did not do.  They did not
show still frames.  While the UFO was stationary, I viewed several still
frames that clearly showed a lot of clear detail. I guess the eye
integrates all the frames and says blurry.

  THE BLURRY (MOVING) IMAGE WAS VERY CLEAR ON SOME OF MY FRAMES.

It was saucer shaped and had a dome on top.  The sides had dark
rectangular openings and tiny wings hung over the dark horizontal
rectangular openings.  The UFO spewed out what looked like gas.  It
hovered, rotated and spewed out more gases in another direction.  I could
see the UFO ejecting something that looked like gas that produced a
distortion of the image.  The gas made everything blurry.  The gas left a
trail that dissipated shortly after it was ejected.  As the gas
dissipated, it was constantly replenished.  More gas was ejected, but not
always in the same direction.  Maybe this was a cloaking device or just a
by product of their propulsion system.  I guess the gas stuff might not
really be gas but it distorted vision.  I think we all have seen the way
heat can distort images on a hot day.  I donât think earth technology
could do what these things do.  I think we may have some secret speed
demons but I donât think we have anything like this.  Some UFOs hover and
then instantly speed away so fast it almost looks like they are
disappearing.  Sometimes, motion pictures show just a faint, small streak
going away from where they were.  If this is what others reported before
the age of the video camera, then there is no way earth governments could
have had this technology 15 - 50 years ago.  I think 60 Minutes and 7
families video taped a real UFO event, the so called undeniable evidence.
 I have always had an open but skeptical mind but this show made a
believer of me.  Can anyone confirm the fairly clear freeze frame images
that I saw and still have?  Can we conclude that it is highly probably
that these UFOs were alien ships because the other explanations are
highly improbably?  I donât this was a hoax by 60 minutes, do you?  I
donât think these UFOs were secret military aircraft, do you?  I think
this is the undeniable evidence, do you?  I appreciate constructive
criticism but it would be more meaningful if you taped the show and have
viewed it frame by frame like I did.  What I find hard to understand is
why so few people care about this.  I told a few people but they were not
interested.  One man said, ãSo what, they're not blowing up buildings or
anythingä.  I laugh hysterically when I think of that.  Some parts of the
government have vast resources and I have almost none.  If I can see this,
 donât you think they can too?  Iâll bet they (the government) are
working as hard as they can to communicate (not with us).  Itâs just
classified research.  What else could that UFO be other than alien space
craft or a 60 minutes hoax or an experimental government airplane?  I
think its performance was too advanced to be one of ours and I donât
think 60 minutes orchestrated a hoax.  I have seen similar UFOs on Gulf
Breeze tapes. They can transform from standing still to a speed of
thousands of miles an hour.  I think they can produce artificial
gravitational forces.  That way the crew would not be crushed because
they too would be accelerated.  I think this is a big story but most
people are not interested.  That boggles my mind.  Good information is
hard to come by.  Glenn Campbell was a guest on the Larry King UFO
special in Oct 94.  Glenn publishes a newsletter that you might like.  I
emphasize might because he seems to concentrate on the political life at
AREA 51.  E-mail subscriptions are free.  All you have to do is e-mail a
request for the newsletter to [e-mail]     Does anyone know if
any of Larry Kings other (Oct 1) guests have similar newsletters?  Dr.
Greer was also one of Larry's guests.  Another (I think) was Mr. Friedman.

        Ed Pisciotta    [e-mail]